I suppose the difference between a flammable petrol/diesel car Vs flammable electric car is that a petrol or diesel can be put out far easier. Which is a major consideration.
In my opinion if the government had been serious about us all driving electric cars they would have been investing in the infrastructure 15 years ago. Ie charging points on new houses even 15 years ago. Baring in mind tis was possible as the Nissan leaf, vauxhall ampara etc have been around a long time. Same with investing in the charging points etc that long back too.
Which makes me think two things.
1. Either the government want the vast majority of the public out of car ownership/usage as the infrastructure isn't their to charge 2 cars per household across the country (bare in mind the average household has 4 cars now).
2. Like they did the diesel cars in the 90s/noughties they persuaded people to buy them as they were cheaper to run and allegedly greener. Now further down the line they're telling us the opposite about diesels and telling us electric are the future.
I bet this will change and they'll tell us electric cars aren't good for the environment and persuade people to switch to new tech such as synthetic fuel or hydrogen.
At the end of the day it all depends on where our corrupt politicians have their money invested affects what they try and enforce or bring into effect on us.
A good example of this was when the politicians invested in haulage, motorway construction companies etc in the 1950s/early 1960s then deliberately destroyed the rail industry by initially banning mixed freight then closing services which were vital to push people into cars. Beaching was the unused as the Scape goat.
Bare in mind all towns and some villages had a rail yard where goods were unloaded then a Scammel scarab 3 wheeled lorry was used to transport the goods around the town or village.